Great. This blunder clearly falls on the account of the Constitutional Protection Office, which prefers to spy on and incite rather than build clean procedures. And on the political leadership, which should have foreseen this debacle beforehand - either they failed because they weren't informed (which in my opinion would already be a disaster - a Constitutional Protection Office uncontrolled by Parliament is itself unconstitutional), or they bungled it because they knew about it and naively believed the Constitutional Court would overlook such a glaring mistake.
And what's the result? Instead of clearly positioning itself against ultra-right ideology, the Right will celebrate it as a victory and feel vindicated. Great. Thanks for that.
I found the original article at TAZ.