So let's summarize this one more time:
- SCO claims to have all rights to Unix
SCO claims that Linux contains infringements of rights
SCO itself actively marketed a Linux until recently, even after its own lawsuit against IBM
SCO still provides support for its own Linux today with download options for current kernel versions for its distribution
SCO doesn't even have all rights, since some of the rights are held by Novell
SCO has to this day failed to provide proof of where exactly these rights violations are
Have I forgotten any essential part of this farce, or is that already all of SCO's nonsense bundled together?
You can find the original article at heise online news here.