It is obvious that the acceptance of DRM systems cannot be decided and implemented by courts. This can only happen through cooperation between rights holders and manufacturers of copying programs - an interesting standpoint. So DRM is completely irrelevant to the user, who is not asked anyway. It is solely about copy program manufacturers wanting to fleece users just as much as rights holders do. User freedoms can then be trampled on without a second thought.
At heise online news you can find the original article.