Is there any more brain-dead activity than suing a doctoral student for exposing the bottomless stupidity of a copy protection manufacturer (actually more of a snake-oil salesman)? The company clearly sold something with its alleged copy protection that simply doesn't match the specifications - because it's not copy protection at all, just ridiculous. Now wanting to slaughter the messenger and then even claiming 10 million in losses from fraud money is really the height of idiocy. At heise online news you can find the original article.