|KK| The questions Meisner should ask himself, if he's already mounting such a high moral horse, are laid out in the Telepolis article: What healthy organism is Meisner talking about? Pedophile priests? The repressed sexuality in the Catholic Church, which gifts the urges of its dignitaries to God, but neither to women nor men? Is the archbishop talking about holy matrimony, which remains a sacrament only in the fulfillment of procreation, but not of desire? Does he mean the "housekeeper concubinages" behind the doors of the parsonage? Or should he talk about the misery of illegitimate priest's children, who are denied today and were abandoned in the times of Urban II, while their mothers were sold as slaves? - but Meisner will definitely never engage with that. Because it cannot be what must not be. The question I ask myself when I read quotes from Meisner: when verbally propagating his unspeakable disgustingness, does he actually have an erection?
At Telepolis News you can find the original article.