And he keeps spinning on. If indeed Linux 2.2 - and this is now a statement from SCO itself - had no problems, then Linux could still set up at that level without problems and continue on. The Linux 2.2 kernel was readily functional and usable. So if he were right (which would be absurd and silly - because so far he's done nothing but spout hot air), it certainly wouldn't be the catastrophe he's talking about.
Apart from the fact that he still hasn't grasped that Linux is the kernel and not the system - switching the kernel is really the least of all problems.
And also charming is the claim that suddenly there are millions of lines of code that SCO is now objecting to - if there are that many, why can't he produce even a single example so far that holds up to more than 10 minutes of analysis?
The guy is really amusing. Has certain similarities to the former Iraqi information minister, all of McBride's fuss and feathers.
At XMLMania.com - Google News Search: SCO I found the original article.