According to the schedule, SCO has to provide a large amount of information, in particular exactly where the alleged patent violations are located (with file and line number specifications), as well as stating why SCO believes a patent violation exists, whether and if so who else had access, and some other information surrounding this whole matter. I'm really curious to see what SCO can actually submit to the court.

IBM, by the way, doesn't have to submit anything until SCO has completed their part, and that's also part of the judge's ruling.

Here you can find the original article.