Once again, proof of the inhumanity of certain judges. The verdict could easily come from Schill: Rather, due to existing neglect tendencies resulting from the lack of educational influence from their parents, the children were recognizably interested in the sexual acts themselves. (...) Moreover, the abused children suffered no recognizable further psychological harm beyond their already existing environmental damage as a result of the accused incidents. How can a judge deliver such a contemptuous justification? Are children from socially problematic circumstances now the lowest of the low, whom one can simply abuse?
At Telepolis News you can find the original article.