Ok, that should have given SCO some heartburn: Novell is giving SCO an ultimatum to drop its interpretation of the restrictions on Sequent code (Dynix - one of the Unix derivatives that SCO views as problematic in its lawsuit against IBM, since code from it allegedly made its way into Linux). Novell's key argument is that the protection clause only applies to the original AT&T code and not to code that was newly added in Sequent. That of course directly undermines one of SCO's arguments. SCO's case is getting shakier and shakier.