The fate of reduce() in Python 3000 - well, it's probably time for me to switch languages. Because anyone who is so stupid as to cut themselves off from Lisp roots will only manage to rebuild more powerful possibilities with primitive means. Ruby also looks very useful and I'm slowly getting used to the syntax ...
Anonymous functions (lambda in Python, blocks in Ruby or Smalltalk) are far more than just obscure Lisp relics. I have many code snippets that live precisely on the fact that I can pass around anonymous code blocks - ultimately, this is about writing your own program structures. In Smalltalk and similar languages (and to some extent in Ruby) you can use this to extend and develop the language itself - which is one of the strengths of Lisp and its friends (and that's why it's also found in Smalltalk and its friends - the Smalltalk developers had a lot of Lisp know-how).
Languages that castrate themselves at this point and think that iterators and list comprehensions (basically nothing more than loops written in shorthand) are a viable replacement for being able to program your own control structures and your own language tools have become completely uninteresting to me. I don't like language designers who think they are smarter than the later programmer and want to impose a language corset on them.