Search engine operator must stand for defamatory entries - please what?
Since no nude pictures of the moderator could actually be found on the Internet, the mere allegation of the existence of such nude photos already violates the general right of personality protected under Section 823 of the Civil Code (BGB) and obliges to refrain from such allegations.
May I translate that: because the judge has interpreted something into the given search query that isn't even there (that old pig), the dirty imagination of the judge is a violation of the search engine's personality rights against the moderator, which doesn't even appear on the page.
Search engines do not make any statements about their search results - they only provide hits for a keyword query. Has someone once again confused cause with symptom? Apart from that: where the hell is the alleged allegation to be seen - only in the fact that search results were found for given keywords? What a ridiculous nonsense.
Or is it just the attempt of a lawyer to provide his unemployed colleagues in the warning faction with lucrative sources of income with little effort delivered to the doorstep? I'm just asking. Quite innocently.