The Lufthansa profits from the deportation of foreigners (since the state pays full fees for an airport slot), but may not be subject to protest as part of an online action. Because that is reprehensible, even if it only concerned the transmission of the annual general meeting and not the actual booking business. Despite registration of the action and prior legal advice, the activist is now convicted. And what is the great damage involved? 43,000 euros for Lufthansa for alleged countermeasures ...
Sorry, but somewhere I have a problem with that. Of course, denial-of-service attacks are a problem and are a pretty massive demonstration - on the other hand, highway blockades, rail blockades or large protest marches on main roads are nothing else. That is, after all, an essential part of a demonstration that a form is chosen that is noticed due to the side effects. Standing somewhere with a candle in your hand, smiling politely, is not a demonstration, but a church convention.
The action against Lufthansa, however, had been prepared and carried out exactly like a demo - but the court ignores the right to demonstrate. It's the internet, who cares. Funny, just a few days ago, interior ministers still wanted to prevent the internet from becoming a lawless space. But they probably meant something else by that ...