No idea what the herb is called that he takes, but it leaves severe brain damage: Beckstein wants German Guantanamo. Apart from the fact that he also wants to shoot suspects in the head and pack foreigners into camps because potential terrorists must not be allowed to run around freely (politicians like him, who are completely crazy, are not only allowed to run around freely but also to express their opinions freely), he is also constitutionally hostile:
Beckstein also criticized the ruling of the Federal Constitutional Court, which in a ruling on Lower Saxony legislation had demanded clear limitations on preventive telephone surveillance. The balance between security and freedom of interests must be re-evaluated, said Beckstein: "That the intimate sphere of terrorists should be protected is for me hardly bearable."
I'm sorry, Mr. Beckstein, but you have failed the test. Because the Constitutional Court does not explicitly protect the intimate sphere of terrorists - but the intimate sphere of citizens. And this is listed in the Basic Law as a protected asset.
Why is someone like this not observed by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution? His hostility to the constitution is really documented multiple times ...