... if you look at the discussion in the law blog about the registration of "Law Blog" as a trademark for Udo Vetter's weblog. And especially the arguments from Robert Basic and Udo's reactions to them. Robert's argument that it seems a bit odd to register a term that has become quite common in general blogging usage is met by Udo with the argument that it's an English term and therefore not a generic term, and that trademark law doesn't even apply in the English-speaking world. Therefore, he wants to claim "law blog" as a title for legal weblogs for himself.
Sorry, but exactly this argument is constantly brought up by some trademark guys from companies - Microsoft tries to argue that Windows is a general term. The story about the Explorer trademark - same nonsense. If even lawyers who are quite familiar with the internet have such strange ideas, you shouldn't be surprised if other lawyers see a way to make money there.
By the way, I am by no means accusing Udo Vetter of wanting to make money with the trademark - especially since it would only affect his colleagues, and as is known, one crow does not peck out the other's eye - it's just about the very strange argumentation past the criticism. About the total inability of a lawyer to understand exactly where the legally untarnished blogger has a problem.
Lawyers and normal people definitely think differently. And I mean that absolutely not in a positive sense.