"Secure Identity = Unique Identity" - "He is convinced that citizens' informational self-determination can be better protected by new technologies, so one should not always see such systems as a threat scenario." - could it be because the protection of informational self-determination has no place at all in their entire presentation? Why is it repeatedly claimed without any basis that something protects informational self-determination, when there is no evidence or concrete example for this? A bit more care in lying would really be appropriate.