Can the rights manager of Enid Blyton now sue over this? Or is there a new book - Five Friends and a Worm? At heise online news you can find the original article.
It's all very strange already. The comments on the post too. Though I'm not sure who should seem funnier to me: the embarrassing Google spammers or this Don Alphonso...
Well, let's wait for the second part, when the great detective has found Jörg
At Der Schockwellenreiter there is the original article.
That's outrageous. Once again, a brainless idiot who thinks that fighting terrorism demands abandoning all principles. And lo and behold, Hohmann immediately shows solidarity with him - because they're both just poor victims. Oh, those poor misunderstood worms. Funny only that these poor misunderstood souls always spout such intellectual garbage.
And no, I am absolutely not of the opinion that one should fight terror with terror (because torture is nothing else). Whoever advocates that - fighting terror with torture - deserves to find themselves in a corresponding situation as a suspect. Then they won't talk such bullshit anymore...
Therefore: such a historian who has learned so little from what he researches deserves to be fired. As a professor, someone so stupid and resistant to learning is unacceptable.
You can find the original article at tagesschau.de - Die Nachrichten der ARD: the original article.
Paul Graham has written a book about hackers (in the Lisp sense — not the twisted and false sense that the press abuses) and their motivations and ideas. It's coming out soon. The whole thing started as an article in which he compares programming to painting — and now there's an entire book about it. Certainly interesting, since Paul Graham himself is one of the more interesting Lisp hackers. Reading the book could therefore also be worthwhile. And it won't make you any dumber either.
Here's the original article.
Today I finally took advantage of the terrible TV program and threw Down by law into the player. Wonderful. And once again I get to be annoyed that I never saw it in the cinema on the big screen. Shots like photographs by Feininger, quirky characters, oblique dialogue, the music by John Lurie and songs by Tom Waits. That's almost cinema nirvana.
This is almost cute. He gets slapped down twice in court and he tries again with the same nonsense as before. By the way, there's prior art: MausNet has always used the vehicle registration abbreviation in the domains for the respective mailbox, just as in the name of each mailbox. And that was long before the silly EU patent ... At heise online news there's the original article.
YES!! No, I don't need the manual anymore. But I can use it to shut people up who bug me with questions
Here's the original article.
Great. Cisco wants to get a technique into TCP/IP that is patented and licensed by Cisco. I hope the IETF doesn't accept this nonsense. As Theo de Raadt correctly noted, there are better solutions. And what Cisco has so proudly patented is so trivial that you have to wonder why on earth anyone granted a patent for it...
That's all we needed, patent madness and patent absurdities in the basic internet protocol

At heise online news there's the original article.
Now the W3C is meddling with Atom by wanting it to become an official W3C spec instead of an IETF draft. I find things like references to how well the Atom group built consensus in the community embarrassing—anyone who followed Atom's development even a little knows that much of this has nothing to do with consensus, but simply with the fact that some people spend more time on it than others and apparently have nothing important to do—and just push through their ideas via relentless siege tactics. The loudest mouths also like to resort to falsifying history and lies just to take a shot at their competitor RSS. Of course, this is answered accordingly by the equally obtuse loudest proponents of RSS. A lovely mud-slinging match with no real value for users.
Anyone who now thinks this exactly reflects the development of HTML back when HTML was still an IETF draft, and believes that the corresponding people deserve nothing more than having their spec end up as a standard at the W3C, has understood the point.
On Workbench you can find the original article.