And here a newspaper proves how little it understands what the internet is all about. Here a search service is even being sued because it links directly to articles. People, think about it: if deep linking is banned, weblogs won't be allowed to link to the articles themselves anymore, only to the publisher's main pages. Anyone who sets a link would first have to check whether it's even legally feasible. Otherwise, he could be sued by such an ignorant organization.
Possibly Handelsblatt is also among those who complain about how much weblogs are displacing their quality content from Google search results.
Originally I reflexively linked to Handelsblatt. But I don't set links to such ignorant people, it could improve their Google ranking after all.
I can only hope that the BGH puts an end to this nonsense.
At heise online news there's the original article.
Hachja, how much that reminds me of the stories with Theo de Raadt in the NetBSD project. Especially the reasoning comes across as very familiar to me
At heise online news there is the original article.
As usual, the linked list is missing the Python Desktop Server again. Unbelievable! By the way, there's now also a Windows installation package for Python Desktop Server available at http://simon.bofh.ms/~louis/. The original article can be found on netbib weblog.
It's like this: how much content disappears behind paywalls or registration barriers? Google and other search engines don't register! How much content disappears behind format barriers? Google does open some common formats, but not all and not in all variations. How much content disappears behind no-linking barriers? Content in proprietary formats simply don't have links pointing into them - and therefore have poor Google rankings too. The same applies to deep-linking preventers.
Example: those dreadful Flash movies where, sensibly enough, the "Skip Intro" link is inside the Flash movie instead of outside in HTML. And where do these geniuses place such a traversal preventer? Right on the homepage. So every bot already fails at the index.html and doesn't search further. Just like everyone who doesn't have Flash. Or everyone who is, for example, visually impaired.
People, get this straight once and for all: you all have a blind buddy, and that's Google (and its colleagues). Sites with poor accessibility, with JavaScript-programmed links instead of normal links, with too much Flash and proprietary formats - all of that makes life difficult not only for the blind, but also for search engines, which are still significantly blinder. You're not only excluding a population group, you're excluding yourselves from the internet infrastructure (links and search engines). And then you expect sympathy?
Instead of thinking it through and putting the content out there, preparing it and linking it where and how it's reachable for search engines, you'd rather spend vast sums on search engine optimizers to push your meager content up in Google. And then of course you're offended when stupid weblogs simply climb up, just because they work exactly as search engine programmers currently imagine it ...
At Der Schockwellenreiter you can find the original article.
Don't worry, the politicians will manage to prevent any influence of reality and facts on their actions. We can rely on one thing: once politicians have found a scapegoat, no statistics from the Federal Statistical Office will stop them from continuing to spread their false opinion into the world ...

At tagesschau im Internet you can find the original article.