Exactly. That's it. Simply use a different search engine. Despite reports to the contrary, the Internet is actually bigger than what Google indexes, and the Internet works just fine without Google too.
(albeit admittedly somewhat more inconvenient in some places - and unfortunately humans are just so lazy...)
At Der Schockwellenreiter you can find the original article.
Well, Mr. Pinkwart, that's how you position yourself as the ideal replacement partner for the SPD in North Rhine-Westphalia. Instead of blocking traffic policy, you demand an end to coal subsidies, which certainly ensures that the SPD in North Rhine-Westphalia loses the next election. Great strategy, Steinbrück will definitely jump on that.

At WDR.de there's the original article.
So Firebird is quite cute. However, it's terribly slow (especially scrolling through pages is unbearable with this awful stuttering), I'm used to faster performance from Safari. But one thing is absolutely top-notch: the extensions (see link at the title). I loaded the Webdeveloper extension and the Checky extension there, the former provides a whole set of web developer tools (such as visual representation of document structure, quick source display, various validators, tools for images, forms, enable/disable various features, etc.). Checky is simply an extension that plugs a large collection of validators for various purposes into the document's popup menu - including auto-discovery of the corresponding parts (e.g., CSS or RSS feeds are automatically found and then validated on request). Great. Now just make the whole thing faster and then I'll be happy.
Here's the original article.
Wiglaf Droste settles accounts bitterly with Friedmann and all the coke noise. Nothing but the truth, the whole truth.

Here you can find the original article.
I found the reason: SCRIPT is an element that can be used both as a block element and as an inline element. A is an inline element. So I can use SCRIPT within A. NOSCRIPT, on the other hand, is a block element. So it's not allowed within an A. That's garbage!
Stupid W3C. Don't they have anyone there who can think? The SCRIPT tag has its counterpart in NOSCRIPT. So it only makes sense if I can use NOSCRIPT in the same place as SCRIPT. But that doesn't work. In the Python Desktop Server Javascript is used in comment links to insert the number of existing comments. There should be an alternative display for this (just a question mark) so empty brackets don't appear. But since the whole thing is inside an A tag, I can use SCRIPT there, but not NOSCRIPT. That's garbage!
Yes, I know I'm repeating myself, but with such stupidity you can only scream. Now I have to choose whether I want valid HTML or HTML that complies with accessibility guidelines. Unfortunately, it's not easy to change the technology in the Python Desktop Server because the Python Community Server only delivers static HTML and therefore dynamic content has to be inserted via Javascript. And that's exactly what Document.write() was invented for. And it could be trivially implemented with a NOSCRIPT alternative for those who don't have or don't want Javascript. Any suggestions (other than changing careers)? Update: here someone commented on this on the W3C mailing lists. The suggestion: set the whole paragraph as an alternative block. No thanks. So NOSCRIPT gets removed - because there are a number of browsers that render the contents of NOSCRIPT even when Javascript is enabled. Here's the original article.
So so. IBM is no longer allowed to use its own AIX either. So if IBM wants to respond to SCO now, they should do it now. The entire industry is waiting for IBM to give SCO a piece of their mind, so come on Big Blue, take them down!

Even though it's quite entertaining this time, overall the whole thing is just another proof of how idiotic all these patent and trademark proceedings are and how absurd such scenarios can become when lawyers and business managers smell money. The whole nonsense certainly no longer serves the actual purpose of patents - securing innovations and protecting inventors from exploitation by companies.
You can find the original article at heise online news with this link.
Great. So people will soon see poverty written on their faces.
For the money bags in parliament and party leadership, it's easy to pass something like this – it doesn't cause them any problems. But normal employees often already have problems with the co-payments for dental prosthetics that exist today. And the fact that dental prosthetic solutions and comprehensive coverage were introduced for good reason (because poor teeth and broken dentures come with various follow-up problems that the health insurance has to pay for anyway), the politicians daydreaming about this aren't thinking about that either. The main thing is to have some kind of position, no matter how absurd or silly it is.
At tagesschau im Internet there's the original article.