Well, it's really alarming how a bit of theater before the UN can actually convince people that a war is now justified. The Union has jumped right on Powell's bandwagon. The question is what their true motivation is, because I don't think even Merkel is stupid enough to believe such hocus pocus...
If a little spectacle with nice slides and neat meaningless digipictures with impressive arrows on them are really enough to put tens of thousands of civilians in danger or simply murder them, then our world has truly gone very far downhill.
With its massive military research, particularly in the areas of bioweapons (in case anyone forgot: the anthrax attacks that made waves for a long time came from US-owned laboratories) and chemical weapons, as well as its refusal to uphold or ratify various treaties, the USA is a far greater danger to the world than Iraq. Especially since the sense of mission of some Americans (who unfortunately happen to also be in government power) is far more pronounced than that of most followers of Islam.
Of course, I can't accept terrorists and terrorist attacks either. But I still don't demand that the USA be attacked just because it provides cover for fascists and neo-Nazis in its country, or even grants them the status of a church.
I found the original article at TAZ here.
Hmm. Wasn't the Civil Service Union supposed to represent civil servants and not public budgets? I must have misunderstood something...
Somehow I have the feeling that the Civil Service Union itself has no idea whatsoever what someone at pay grade A6 or lower actually receives. But of course, all civil servants are teachers and in management positions, civil service postal workers are just a figment of imagination and anyway and so on.
Particularly alarming: the board of the dbb approved it unanimously. Which means civil servants at the lower pay grades are not represented in the Civil Service Union at all.
At tagesschau im Internet there's the original article.
Why do some people actually believe that there must always be a greater purpose behind everything? What happened to the good old "the journey is the destination"? Can't these people imagine that it's simply fun to do something? Not to arrive, but simply to be on the way?
I make pictures on leicaesk.de and hugo.f-2.org., I write texts and comments here, I make software among other things on pyds.muensterland.org - sure, sometimes there's a goal behind it (like building my own blogging tool), but often it's simply the possibility that I can do it that moves me to do it.
Here you can find the original article.
Wow. Heise thinks it's newsworthy that Dell is now doing what Apple has already been doing for almost 5 years - not including floppy drives in PCs.
Meanwhile, at our company (totally PC-infected), it's already been very difficult for several years to find blank floppy disks when you actually discover that you need some. The floppy drives were probably only installed as a dust collection surface...
At heise online news there's the original article.
Wow. As far as I know, this is the first time there apparently is actual evidence. I'm curious to see what kind of comments come up, after all the mobile phone industry has always resisted the claim that mobile phones cause damage. Maybe this will at least lead to labeling requirements, so you can finally compare phone types. Right now everyone is staying pretty quiet about it, the customer shouldn't get nervous after all ...
At heise online news there's the original article.
Grumble. 10.2. I don't have it. But it's probably becoming more urgent that I do the update. But to be able to use the Zaurus under OS X and then also Apple's new X11 ...
At Zaurus Software Index you can find the original article.
Hmm. No snow, but beautiful sunshine and pleasant air. But illness here too - in my case diarrhea, which is why I don't dare venture too far from the toilet.
Still, get well soon to Irene.
At Irene's Notes you can find the original article.
Yuck. Strong, black cocoa (or hot chocolate). Black coffee. Chili powder. Gross. Perverse.
Poor chocolate.
The original article is at Ben Hammersley.com — here.