The most problematic test subject: confusing interface (the icons in the toolbar are admittedly coordinated with each other, but are barely distinguishable at first glance) and significantly worse performance compared to the competition (P2008 and P2004) and then there are also display errors. For example, the entire layout would get scrambled when using the scroll wheel of the trackball. Additionally, extracting information for keywords is not transparent without studying the manual. And the view switching options involve too many clicks for me - I want to be able to quickly and easily regroup my database contents according to different criteria. Here too, iView Media Pro wins hands down (P2004). IPTC photo data is also not read by default in Cumulus either; possibly the optional modules could help there. Of course, the option of different server sizes is good - for professional shops possibly the central criterion, more important than handling issues or greater learning curve. But I'm looking for a solution for an individual photographer.
Also good is the seemingly lower price at first glance. However, you pay for it through option packages - many features that are included with the competition are only available here through option packages. And the demo is only for the basic package and a few optional extras - so you can't test everything beforehand. This made it impossible for me to check whether Kodak RAW format is fully supported here. Which is particularly annoying since I would have been interested in this feature specifically.
All in all, Cumulus leaves me with a very mixed impression - perhaps Canto should let some fresh air into development and give the program a complete overhaul; it simply seems a bit baroque and cumbersome.
Here's the original article.
With as much money behind him as Reemtsma has, one can certainly smile coldly while spouting off. Of course it is completely justified to take action against the publication of texts on the Internet with arrest warrants and similar nonsense. Of course we all understand that the toy of a wealthy moneybags must proceed in this way.
Sure. And pigs can fly ...
At netbib weblog I found the original article.
Also a powerful media database. Nice is the option to support a server installation. Good also that it is a clean Mac OS X application. However, I find the user interface somewhat sparse.
A significant disadvantage is the small number of supported image formats - with my old DCS I'm stuck anyway, but other digital camera users will certainly miss one or another raw format.
Similarly, I find it rather disadvantageous that no information can be extracted from IPTC image data. Apparently only EXIF is supported - but professional cameras (especially the older ones) store image data in IPTC fields. All in all, I find iView Media Pro (see P2004) significantly better, especially the folder overview available in iView I find very intuitive. In Portfolio I have to work with searches and possibly then create collections from them - but these are static again, not dynamically adapting to new imports. Of course, this was only a quick test for me, so it's quite possible that some things are indeed possible, but the first impression is important to me - if I haven't used software for a long time (because I had no time for photography), I don't want to have to reread the manual...
Here's the original article.
SCO has been given a deadline of 45 days to name exactly which code sections IBM illegally passed from AIX or Dynix to Linux. IBM must provide the corresponding sources within the same timeframe, but SCO cannot insist on receiving the sources first and then taking action themselves. The advantage is that SCO can no longer worm their way out and issue absurd claims to buy more time. The disadvantage is that for another 45 days SCO will continue to confuse the market before their accusations turn out to be hot air ...
Here's the original article.
I'm realizing right now that I urgently need an emoji of someone banging their head on a table out of despair over human idiocy...
At tagesschau im Internet you can find the original article.
Mod-pubsub blog - Infrastructure for Publish Subscribe with Websites
Fascinating: liquid lenses for rapid focusing, modeled after the human eye.
Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com) has the original article.
I always knew that Bonaqua was pure rip-off ...

Here you can find the original article.
PyTable RDBMS Middleware - Simplified work with database drivers in Python
RFC: Subscriptions harmonizer - Synchronization of blog rolls via XMLRPC
If your work becomes harder because this outrageous Federal Court of Justice decided that even alleged terrorists have rights, then I'm truly terribly sorry for you. It is certainly extremely annoying when you have to present evidence and cannot simply withhold exonerating witnesses and otherwise base your case on unverifiable claims (because they're kept under wraps) when you want to throw someone in prison for 15 years. It is certainly a real cheek that in the future you'll have to think about how to incorporate information from intelligence services—the same intelligence services that have been wrong at every turn and have sometimes simply fabricated evidence—into proceedings.
I have a good suggestion for you: why not simply use only information that can also be presented in court. And remember the principle of benefit of the doubt for the accused. Then things will go better in the next instance...
Realtime Blocking Lists are actually a good idea for fighting spam. You register open relays or spammers and you can use them to block them well on mail servers. The downside: apparently such services are only run by sociopaths or alternatively complete technical idiots.
SORBS belongs to the latter category. Just enter the IP 62.153.201.130 (a server I administer). What problem does it throw out? High-port-FTP-server. So FTP servers on ports that deviate from the standard.
Great. What's unusual about that? Pretty much every Zope server has something like that (and the high-port FTP on 8021 is exactly that - a Zope). And the other two are simply private FTP servers for two users that happen to run on different ports because the main FTP server is on the same IP anyway...
Here you can find the original article.
Hmm. I hope the top-level domain .ms doesn't go the same way as .tv, namely under
At NETZEITUNG.DE Science I found the original article.
Welcome Page - Hierarchical database for Python and large data quantities