I would have been surprised if it had actually worked - Theo is not exactly the most accommodating and cooperative person, and conflicts with the idea of "whoever is not with us is against us" were pretty much inevitable. Still, it's a shame that the Americans let themselves be guided by ideology and nationalism once again, instead of simply implementing what is actually a good idea. After all, work on OpenBSD benefits the entire open source community - just think of OpenSSH.
At heise online news you can find the original article.
Have they been quietly shrinking in recent years, or why hasn't anyone noticed this before?

At tagesschau im Internet there's the original article.
With this whole server shared apartment story, I keep wondering if the servers regularly argue about who's supposed to do the backup, or who's doing the filesystem check, and why the edge server is already responsible for content delivery again, even though the other servers do much less ...

At das Netzbuch - ralles Weblog there's the original article.
Jutta settles accounts with the hype surrounding 20six in the media and other blogs (some of which also do so indirectly through constantly repeated links). What strikes me about the whole story is this claim that 20six (or other similarly structured systems) would be a community - but is it really?
The term community is gladly used in an inflationary way as soon as someone has a great idea and benefits from the — sometimes voluntary and free — services of others. Sure, for the operator it's marketing (and nobody will be too explicit about the true core, that they live off and profit from the voluntary work of their users — that would be economic suicide). Can you simply declare a community into existence, like the chancellor declares a state of emergency?
Why do users accept being co-opted like this? Without having the true freedoms of a community? Herd mentality? Is subordination cool? Or is learning how to do it yourself (or how to properly participate with others) simply too tedious and too much work?
Is it simply more convenient to go to a server where the operator exploits your own work, but in return proudly holds up the community sign to the outside world, without having to do anything for it yourself?
I'd find it boring if I didn't get to experience all the problems and frustrations of doing things yourself. When I have the choice between taking something ready-made or building it myself, I choose the build-it-myself route. Maybe I'm just perverted ...
At Hexentanz, there's the original article.
I don't see much difference between the Afghan Taliban, who shot up the Buddha statues with anti-tank weapons, and the US administration, who deemed the oil ministry important enough to protect but allowed the National Museum and National Library to be ransacked and destroyed. And the fact that the Americans are confirming the prejudice about their cultural barbarism here is no consolation either.
I found the original article on Telepolis News.
I'm curious to see how SQLite performs there. I've looked at it several times myself and have been searching for a project to use it in. There are also Python bindings for SQLite (even on the Zaurus - I think that's where it will first be used for me).
At Der Schockwellenreiter you can find the original article.
The Americans will make sure they find weapons of mass destruction. If they can't find them based on their sales receipts, they'll just bring some themselves

At tagesschau im Internet you can find the original article.
And when Mars has brushed its teeth properly, it means here too: Mom, he didn't drill at all!

At Astronomische Kleinigkeiten you can find the original article.