Why does a disgusting taste always remain in my mouth when I read these vexatious lawsuits from American lawyers? Certainly, it is justified to demand compensation for the relatives of the victims - there are German courts for that to handle. But the Americans' demands again lose all sense of proportion and really only give rise to the suspicion also expressed by the railway: that the lawyers only want to profit from the suffering of others.
This does not serve the matter itself - namely ensuring compliance with safety regulations and improving the operational safety of the railway so that such catastrophes cannot occur again. And the dead will not come back to life from excessive demands either ...
You can find the original article at tagesschau im Internet - here.
Will this work better than with the mosquitoes in amber? I don't know, frozen mammoth urine doesn't exactly sound like a trustworthy basis ";-]"
At Spiegel Online: Wissenschaft you can find the original article.
With DarwinPorts, there is an environment available for installing Unix programs from source, similar to the BSD Ports structure.
What is it? With DarwinPorts you can very easily install Unix software directly from the sources without having to laboriously fetch and patch the sources first. That's the idea.
Basically a very convenient installation structure similar to Debian packages, only based on source. In this respect DarwinPorts is very similar to Fink. So why do you need DarwinPorts? I was initially quite enthusiastic because I assumed it would be the real Ports environment (similar to how GNU-Darwin for example uses the Ports from FreeBSD and thus already has a huge set of programs ready to compile - significantly more than Fink) from BSD. Nothing doing - it's its own development. And not even more software in it than Fink. And even better: the make install crashes for me with a bus error in pkg_mkindex.tcl
To be honest: we don't need ten different installation systems for Mac OS X, we need one that really runs smoothly and works. And so I'd rather stick with Fink, which works flawlessly and by now already has a somewhat fuller list of supported packages.
I found the original article at Der Schockwellenreiter.
To the remarks by Jutta, I'd like to add just my perspective as a system administrator. Because in addition to the problem of the data volume that accumulates (and which many still pay for based on data volume), there's another problem: bounces on bounces. The result of "contaminated" address lists is that many emails bounce. Those that bounce to forged but real user addresses land in that user's mailbox and annoy them. The others that cannot be delivered usually end up as corresponding system bounces in the mailbox of the system administrator of one of the involved mail servers.
I'm quite directly affected on several systems where I'm admin - the result is often unreadable bounce mail folders because so much flows in that you don't really want to wade through it to search for real problems. As a result, system problems that lead to mail delivery issues are often only noticed when users complain - nobody looks at the mess of bounce mail before that, just as little as the error reports of the mail server.
So if you like your system administrators (or simply want your mail to be handled properly), then think about them too when you carry out such anti-spam actions.
At Hexentanz there's the original article.