Another broadcast that humanity doesn't need. Esoteric nonsense spread with public broadcasting funds. Just great. But then again, we still broadcast church services and papal appearances on television, which is exactly the same kind of humbug. Whether someone claims to be able to bend spoons or claims their inspirations come from God - it's all humbug. And we happily pass it on, because criticism of humbug makes you out to be a nitpicker and someone without imagination. And ever since Hohlmann, we know that we imaginationless nitpickers are the evil perpetrators ...
What I could never quite wrap my head around though: if natural science already offers such fascinating aspects as promiscuous bonobos, fart-speaking herrings (if only Walter Mörs had known about that!), and black holes - who still needs esoteric humbug?
At Telepolis News you can find the original article.
That gives the term "land under" a whole new dimension ... tagesschau im Internet has the original article.
Well, it would certainly be asking too much if the chancellor had to think about whether perhaps his absurd policies are to blame for the poor performance

I found the original article on RP-Online: Politik.
What a load of crap. That would mean I'd have to copy the corresponding films from file-sharing networks - after all, I only watch my DVDs on my notebook. Ok, not that I'd want to see Hulk in any form on any device - the film is so bad that it probably should never have been made in the first place. Why such garbage even needs copy protection is really beyond me - the film's poor quality alone should be enough to ensure that nobody wants to copy this trash.

At heise online news you can find the original article.
The Wonderful World of Genetic Engineering Vultures
The original article can be found at Telepolis News.
Nice Summary of Darl McBride's Complete Loss of Reality

I find his idea particularly amusing that Novell and Redhat could have anything to do with whether Linux is free or not (aside from the fact that it was never free - even a download has costs). Does this joker seriously believe that projects like Debian would stop their work just because he talks nonsense?
Even if the GPL were attacked in some form (which hardly anyone besides SCO's leadership believes), that would only mean a portion of software would become problematic for Linux distributions. And a large part of GPL software comes from the FSF or has been transferred to the FSF - and is thus far outside SCO's reach. But they apparently never understood that a kernel isn't the whole system anyway, what can you expect from such trolls...
But what does SCO actually have to offer for the future? The partially over 10 years old Open Server? The Unixware that hasn't been developed significantly in 5 years? Ridiculous. The only somewhat modern product they have would be their Linux distribution.
At heise online news there is the original article.
Wow. McBride is really a bombshell. So the Free Software community is equated with:
- filesharing
- dot-com bubble
- free love (particularly dreadful!)
And anyway, that the GPL would be attacked is solely IBM's fault. And the world software market is in danger! That's why WIPO has also stepped in and is beating the Intellectual Property drum again.
I'm feeling quite evil right now.

At XMLMania.com - Google News Search: SCO I found the original article.
Oh cool, the next one wants to try their teeth on BSD again. The question remains which BSD - the market is even more fragmented than the Linux market with alone three larger kernel projects and some userland implementations on foreign kernels
At XMLMania.com - Google News Search: SCO I found the original article.