Und noch was zu Lomborg, hier die Antwort von Scientific American zu der Kritik ihrer Ausgabe, die sich mit Lomborgs Thesen auseinandersetzt. As for the status of Lomborg's book: Many people claim to have scientific arguments when they do not: creationists, ancient astronaut theorists and the like. Being able to cite the scientific literature does not automatically confer validity on one's argument, nor does it make the argument genuinely scientific.