Klaus Staeck on the Danger of 'Blogorrhoea'

Klaus Staeck on the danger of "blogorrhea" - and where, pray tell, is the quality journalism in times of regional dominance of the Springer press in areas above 90%? I can't find even a whiff of quality in any product from the house. Should the few other editorial teams be expected to do it all? Seems more than doubtful when I consider that most alternatives to the Springer press are either just as terribly bad, or write from a rather conservative worldview. Either you trust the media consumers with media competence - then you must accept blogs at least as much as the Springer press - or you don't trust them with media competence. Then you must also consistently argue against the Blödzeitung and similar waste of paper. Bad journalism doesn't suddenly become better just because you print it. And good journalism remains good, even if it has never been through a rotary press.