Uni Bayreuth: Guttenberg deliberately deceived. Now it's official. It's all just plagiarized. However, it is strange that in such a debacle, the two people who reviewed this so-called "dissertation" are not scrutinized more closely. After all, how can a doctoral advisor and a second reviewer review a dissertation without reading it? Or should they have actually read the thing but not noticed that nothing particularly impressive was in it or that it was all just copied?