And another censorship tool installed. The question is: from when are politically left-wing opinions considered development-inhibiting? From when is criticism of the state regarded as development-inhibiting? When does satire cease to be an art form and start being considered a threat to youth?
It's so cheap to justify such censorship tools on the grounds of restricting access to pornography. Nobody will seriously protest and want to present themselves as a potential pig, right?
What actually endangers youth more - the availability of pornography (or rather the availability of pornography distributed in Germany - hard international systems help little with that) or the existence of censorship tools?
And another question: from when will the Regierungspräsidium Düsseldorf in North Rhine-Westphalia, with reference to youth protection regulations, demand the blocking of masses of sites?
Hard pornography is - at least in most cases - misogynistic. Wouldn't it be time to combat the cause of the distorted image of women in society, instead of making ineffective attempts to censor the symptoms? Education and enlightenment, anyone?
At heise online news there's the original article.
I have no expertise in statics, neither for trees nor anything else, but couldn't it also be just perhaps simply the case that here an interest group for expert witnesses sees their members' livelihoods swimming away? The suspicion really does suggest itself...
At Spiegel Online: Science there's the original article.
I don't quite know why, but somehow I can't imagine Schily using his privileges. I mean, getting drunk and causing a riot in London would be just barely conceivable (if only remotely), but driving a herd of sheep over the London Bridge is much less so (and I'm refusing to make any statement about the use of the silk rope ...)
I found the original article on RP-Online: Politik.
Ok, politician behavior is often irrational and strange, but I wouldn't normally suspect hash

I found the original article at RP-Online: Politik.
In class - American schools are selling lessons to the RIAA so they can then drum their version of reality into students' heads and improve their budget in the process. Great idea. Microsoft could be sold hours where they explain why open source is anti-American, and maybe some hours to Diebold too, why controlling the functionality of voting machines violates the DMCA?

I found the original article at lies.com.
A summary at Rollberg of links to current efforts to dismantle the social system. Much of it fits very well into the Banana Republic Germany.
At Der Rollberg you can find the original article.